Turkish Second League
- Land:
- Saison:
-
Marktwert: €129 M
- Divisionsebene: 3
- Höhere Division: First League
Turkish Second League Tabelle
| Position | ST | 25/26 | Verein |
|
|
Punkte |
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Neu |
|
|
3 |
|
|||||||||
| 2 | – | 16th |
Kütahyaspor |
|
|
3 |
|
||||||||
| 3 | – | Neu |
|
|
3 |
|
|||||||||
| 4 | – | 9th |
|
|
3 |
|
|||||||||
| 5 | – | 5th |
|
|
3 |
|
|||||||||
| 6 | – | 15th |
|
|
1 |
|
|||||||||
| 7 | – | 7th |
|
|
1 |
|
|||||||||
| 8 | – | 13th |
|
|
1 |
|
|||||||||
| 9 | – | 11th |
|
|
1 |
|
|||||||||
| 10 | – | Neu |
|
|
1 |
|
|||||||||
| 11 | – | Neu |
|
|
|
||||||||||
| 12 | – | 14th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 13 | – | 6th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 14 | – | 11th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 15 | – | 10th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 16 | – | 6th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 17 | – | Neu |
|
|
|
||||||||||
| 18 | – | 8th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 19 | – | 13th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 20 | – | 8th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 21 | – | 12th |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||||||
| 22 | – | 12th |
|
|
0 |
|
Turkish Second League Summary
Top 3
Performance Leaders
Scoring
Current Form
Home/Away Leaders
League Statistics
Turkish Second League Standings 26/27
Currently, Sakaryaspor leads Turkish Second League with 3 points after 1 matches, scoring an impressive 3 goals. Their current form is W, showing 1 wins in their last 5 matches. Ankara Demirspor follows in second place with 3 points , while Yeni Orduspor holds third position with 3 points .
In terms of recent form, Sakaryaspor has been the most impressive with W , while Somaspor has struggled with D .
Şanlıurfaspor has been strongest at home with 1 wins from 1 matches, while Sakaryaspor leads the away form with 1 victories on the road.
Kütahyaspor leads the scoring charts with 4 goals, while Ankara Demirspor has the league's best defense, conceding only 0 goals.
At the other end of the table, Arnavutköy Belediyespor currently occupies the bottom position with 0 points, having won 0 matches and lost 1 this season. Their goal difference of -3 reflects their challenging campaign.